کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
613856 | 880731 | 2006 | 15 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |

The X-ray standing wave technique was used to probe the sensitivity of Zn2+ and Sr2+ ion adsorption to changes in both the adsorbed ion coverage and the background electrolyte species and concentrations at the rutile (α-TiO2) (110)–aqueous interface. Measurements were made with various background electrolytes (NaCl, NaTr, RbCl, NaBr) at concentrations as high as 1 m. The results demonstrate that Zn2+ and Sr2+ reside primarily in the condensed layer and that the ion heights above the Ti–O surface plane are insensitive to ionic strength and the choice of background electrolyte (with <0.1 Å changes over the full compositional range). The lack of any specific anion coadsorption upon probing with Br−, coupled with the insensitivity of Zn2+ and Sr2+ cation heights to changes in the background electrolyte, implies that anions do not play a significant role in the adsorption of these divalent metal ions to the rutile (110) surface. Absolute ion coverage measurements for Zn2+ and Sr2+ show a maximum Stern-layer coverage of ∼0.5 monolayer, with no significant variation in height as a function of Stern-layer coverage. These observations are discussed in the context of Gouy–Chapman–Stern models of the electrical double layer developed from macroscopic sorption and pH-titration studies of rutile powder suspensions. Direct comparison between these experimental observations and the MUltiSIte Complexation (MUSIC) model predictions of cation surface coverage as a function of ionic strength revealed good agreement between measured and predicted surface coverages with no adjustable parameters.
The X-ray standing wave measurements probe the height sensitivity of divalent metals (Sr2+ and Zn2+) adsorbed at the rutile TiO2 (110)–aqueous interface to changes of background electrolytes.Figure optionsDownload as PowerPoint slide
Journal: Journal of Colloid and Interface Science - Volume 295, Issue 1, 1 March 2006, Pages 50–64