Informed decision making among first-degree relatives of prostate cancer survivors: A pilot randomized trial

BackgroundFirst degree relatives (FDRs) of men diagnosed with prostate cancer (PCa) are at increased risk for developing the disease, due in part to multiple concurrent risk factors. There is a lack of innovative targeted decision aids to help FDRs make an informed decision about whether or not to undergo PCa screening.PurposeThis randomized pilot trial evaluated the efficacy of a targeted PCa screening decision aid in unaffected FDRs of PCa survivors.MethodsSeventy-eight Black and White FDRs were randomized to one of two decision aid groups; 39 to a FDR-targeted decision aid and 39 to a general decision aid. The targeted decision aid group received a general PCa decision aid booklet plus a newly developed decision aid DVD targeted specifically for FDRs. PCa screening decision outcomes included knowledge, decisional conflict, distress, and satisfaction with screening decision. Outcomes were assessed at baseline and 4 weeks after baseline.ResultsThere were no differences by intervention group for knowledge, decisional conflict, distress, or satisfaction with screening decision (p > 0.05). However, men in both groups had significant increases in knowledge and decreases in decisional conflict (p < 0.001). These changes were most pronounced (p < 0.05) for younger men compared to older men.ConclusionResults suggest that general and targeted information can play an important role in increasing knowledge and decreasing decisional conflict among FDRs. Additional research is needed to identify subgroups of men who benefit the most and better understand the outcomes of a screening decision aid among diverse samples of FDRs.