کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
6162423 1249392 2014 7 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
A randomized controlled trial comparing intravesical to extravesical ureteroneocystostomy in living donor kidney transplantation recipients
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
یک کارآزمایی بالینی کنترل شده تصادفی با مقایسه یوره ریزوسویوستومی درون شکمی و عصبی در گیرندگان پیوند کلیه اهداکنندگان زنده
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت پزشکی و دندانپزشکی بیماری‌های کلیوی
چکیده انگلیسی
Urological complications after kidney transplantation are mostly related to the ureteroneocystostomy leading to significant morbidity, mortality, and high costs. The most commonly used techniques for the ureteroneocystostomy are the intravesical and the extravesical anastomosis. No evidence in favor of one of these two anastomoses exists. Our aim was to determine the technique with the best outcome regarding urological complications in a prospective randomized controlled trial (Netherlands Trial Register NTR2320). We randomized 200 consecutive recipients of a living donor kidney for either an intravesical or an extravesical anastomosis. The primary outcome was defined as placement of a percutaneous nephrostomy. No significant differences were found in the number of percutaneous nephrostomy placements or ureter reinterventions between both groups. Nevertheless, significantly fewer urinary tract infections occurred in the group with an extravesical anastomosis. In addition, this anastomosis was performed significantly faster compared with the intravesical anastomosis. Thus, extravesical ureteroneocystostomy was associated with significantly fewer urinary tract infections and might be preferable because of its surgical simplicity.
ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Kidney International - Volume 85, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 471-477
نویسندگان
, , , , , , ,