کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
61685 | 47598 | 2011 | 7 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
![عکس صفحه اول مقاله: An atomic-scale investigation of carbon in MoS2 hydrotreating catalysts sulfided by organosulfur compounds An atomic-scale investigation of carbon in MoS2 hydrotreating catalysts sulfided by organosulfur compounds](/preview/png/61685.png)
From an interplay of Scanning Tunneling Microscopy (STM), X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS) experiments, and density functional theory (DFT) calculations, we investigate the fundamental effect of the use of organosulfur compounds for the sulfidation of MoS2 nanoclusters in the hydrotreating catalyst. Our results reveal that incorporation of carbon in MoS2-based hydrotreating catalysts as carbide-type phase is not favorable when synthesized with or exposed to dimethyl disulfide (DMDS) or dimethyl sulfide (DMS). These results suggest that substitution of sulfur with carbon on the predominant type of edge structures in MoS2 nanoclusters is thermodynamically unfavorable, a result that is confirmed by DFT to be valid for all edge structures of MoS2 exposed under catalytically relevant conditions. However, the results show that the choice of the sulfiding agent can strongly influence the morphology and dispersion of the sulfided phase, and such effects are therefore expected to be of major importance for the activity of the freshly sulfided catalyst.
From Scanning Tunneling Microscopy (STM), X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS) experiments, and density functional theory (DFT) calculations, we reveal that incorporation of carbon in MoS2-based hydrotreating catalysts as carbide-type phase is not favorable when synthesized with or exposed to dimethyl disulfide (DMDS) or dimethyl sulfide (DMS).Figure optionsDownload high-quality image (117 K)Download as PowerPoint slideHighlights
► We investigate organosulfur compounds for sulfidation of MoS2 hydrotreating catalysts.
► Our results reveal that incorporation of carbon in MoS2 is not favorable.
► Instead, the choice of sulfiding agent can influence the dispersion of the MoS2 phase.
Journal: Journal of Catalysis - Volume 281, Issue 2, 25 July 2011, Pages 345–351