کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
6204777 | 1264917 | 2014 | 9 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
- Insertion force and its relation to under-reaming play an important role in THA.
- For 1 and 2Â mm under-reaming the cup maintained a stable fixation during loading.
- Increase in under-reaming results in higher stresses, especially at the interface.
- Under-reaming by 2Â mm requires an impact force that is 22.5% greater than 1Â mm.
- Micromotion is only reduced by 13% when under-reaming by 2Â mm compared to 1Â mm.
BackgroundOne of the main goals in total hip replacement is to preserve the integrity of the hip kinematics, by well positioning the cup and to make sure its initial stability is congruent and attained. Achieving the latter is not trivial.MethodsA finite element model of the cup-bone interface simulating a realistic insertion and analysis of different scenarios of cup penetration, insertion, under-reaming and loading is investigated to determine certain measurable factors sensitivity to stress-strain outcome. The insertion force during hammering and its relation to the cup penetration during implantation is also investigated with the goal of determining the initial stability of the acetabular cup during total hip arthroplasty. The mathematical model was run in various configurations to simulate 1 and 2Â mm of under-reaming at various imposed insertion distances to mimic hammering and insertion of cup insertion into the pelvis. Surface contact and micromotion at the cup-bone interface were evaluated after simulated cup insertion and post-operative loading conditions.FindingsThe results suggest a direct correlation between under-reaming and insertion force used to insert the acetabular cup on the micromotion and fixation at the cup-bone interface.InterpretationWhile increased under-reaming and insertion force result in an increase amount of stability at the interface, approximately the same percentage of surface contact and micromotion reduction can be achieved with less insertion force. We need to exercise caution to determine the optimal configuration which achieves a good conformity without approaching the yield strength for bone.
Journal: Clinical Biomechanics - Volume 29, Issue 10, December 2014, Pages 1177-1185