کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
620531 1455170 2015 12 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Comparison of structured adsorbents for the adsorptive isolation of food ingredients from large streams
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
مقایسه جاذب های ساختاری برای جداسازی جذب مواد غذایی از جریان های بزرگ
موضوعات مرتبط
مهندسی و علوم پایه مهندسی شیمی تصفیه و جداسازی
چکیده انگلیسی


• Methodology for chromatographic structure selection under different conditions.
• Studied potential of channeled monoliths in industrial chromatographic separations.
• HETP and specific productivity comparison for (channeled) monoliths and packed bed.
• Window of design for three adsorptive structures at different process requirements.

We present guidelines for the configuration of industrial scale chromatographic separation of small molecules. We compared the performance of different axial packed beds, channeled monoliths and a continuous monolith assuming silica as base material. The calculated mass transfer rates were used to calculate the height of a theoretical plate (HETP). The HETP and pressure drop relations as a function of velocity were used to calculate the resultant velocity and packing length for different conditions (efficiency, pressure drop, affinity constant and throughput). The specific productivity of channeled monoliths can be up to 2.5 orders of magnitude higher than that of a packed bed. This implies that at large scales (in which the pressure drops need to be limited, and the flow rate is high), channeled monoliths are preferred since they may reduce the equipment size up to 100 times and the required resin volume up to 1000 times. Accordingly, we demonstrate the potential of channeled monoliths in chromatographic processes but also draw a window pointing out the feasible configurations to use with the highest productivity for a given set of process requirements.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Chemical Engineering Research and Design - Volume 98, June 2015, Pages 240–251
نویسندگان
, , , ,