کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
6208522 1603975 2016 6 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Comparison of Gait Motion Including Postoperative Trunk Deflection Between Direct Lateral and Anterolateral Approaches in Supine Total Hip Arthroplasty
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
مقایسه حرکت خلفی شامل انحراف تنه خلفی بعد از عمل در بین روشهای جانبی و انترولتری مستقیم در آرتروپلاستی هیپ
کلمات کلیدی
رویکرد یک جانبه موقعیت خوابیده، رویکرد مستقیم لبه، تجزیه و تحلیل راه رفتن محدوده حرکت تنش تنه
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت پزشکی و دندانپزشکی ارتوپدی، پزشکی ورزشی و توانبخشی
چکیده انگلیسی

BackgroundA prospective study was conducted to compare the effect of an anterolateral approach in the supine position (ALS) with that of a direct lateral (DL) approach on gait motion, including trunk deflection, in walking after total hip arthroplasty. We hypothesized that trunk deflection in walking after ALS would be significantly improved in comparison with use of the DL approach.MethodsThe subjects were 15 patients, with 7 in the ALS group and 8 in the DL group. Walking before and 9 and 28 weeks after surgery was analyzed using 3-dimensional motion analysis.ResultsWalking velocity, stride length, hip joint range of motion in the sagittal plane in walking, and locomotion range of trunk inclination were significantly improved 28 weeks after surgery in both groups. In gait analysis, there were no significant differences between the 2 groups.ConclusionThis study was conducted to compare the effect of ALS with that of a DL approach on locomotion in walking after total hip arthroplasty. Hip pain at 9 weeks after surgery was significantly improved using ALS compared to the DL approach, but there were no significant differences in gait function at 28 weeks after surgery using ALS or DL approach. Further long-term studies are required to examine differences between these procedures.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: The Journal of Arthroplasty - Volume 31, Issue 7, July 2016, Pages 1603-1608
نویسندگان
, , , , , , , ,