کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
6208784 1603981 2016 4 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Is Preoperative Nasal Povidone-Iodine as Efficient and Cost-Effective as Standard Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Screening Protocol in Total Joint Arthroplasty?
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
آیا پودودن بینی ید قبل از عمل به عنوان موثر و موثر به عنوان پروتئین غربالگری استافیلوکوکوس اورئوس مقاوم به متی سیلین در مجموع آرتروپلاستی مشترک است؟
کلمات کلیدی
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت پزشکی و دندانپزشکی ارتوپدی، پزشکی ورزشی و توانبخشی
چکیده انگلیسی

The purpose of this study was to compare nasal povidone-iodine swab for total joint arthroplasty patients to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) screening on the incidence of 90-day postoperative surgical site infections in total knee and hip arthroplasties as well as the cost-effectiveness. This is a single-center retrospective review of primary or revision total knee or hip arthroplasty patients. There were 849 patients screened for MRSA and 1004 patients in the nasal swab groups, both with an infection rate of 0.8%. The mean cost for the nasal swab was $27.21 (SD, 0), significantly different (P ≤ .01) than the mean cost for MRSA screens, $121.16 (SD, 26.18). There were significant cost savings with no difference in infection rates; therefore, nasal povidone-iodine swab antiseptic is financially and clinically successful.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: The Journal of Arthroplasty - Volume 31, Issue 1, January 2016, Pages 215-218
نویسندگان
, , , , , ,