کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
6209295 | 1603995 | 2014 | 5 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |

This study compared the accuracy of three methods to set tibial component rotational alignment: (1) conventional method, the anteroposterior (AP) axis was determined by the surgeon using anatomical landmarks; (2) partial-navigation method, the tibia was prepared according to the AP axis using a CT-based navigation system and the component was manually positioned; (3) full-navigation method, the tibial component was positioned and fixed with cement under the control of navigation using a newly developed instrument. The conventional method showed considerable deviation (range, â 18.6° to 14.7°), and the partial-navigation method also showed considerable deviation (â 11.3° to 8.1°). In contrast, the full-navigation method significantly improved the accuracy of alignment (â 2.9° to 2.1°). The tibial component can become malaligned during cement fixation, even after proper bone preparation.
Journal: The Journal of Arthroplasty - Volume 29, Issue 12, December 2014, Pages 2352-2356