کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
6211361 | 1267213 | 2014 | 5 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
- We evaluated femoral and tibial tunnel positions following PCL reconstruction.
- A single bundle all-inside tibial inlay technique was performed in 45 patients.
- Measurement grid systems were used to compare the results on CT scans.
- Arthroscopic tibial inlay procedure efficiently replicates anatomical PCL footprints.
BackgroundThe arthroscopic all-inside tibial inlay technique represents a novel procedure for posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction. However, in vivo investigations that evaluate the accuracy of this technique regarding anatomic graft tunnel placement are few. The objective of this study was to analyse the femoral and tibial tunnel apertures using computed tomography (CT) and compare these findings to recommendations in the literature.MethodsCT scans were obtained in 45 patients following single-bundle PCL reconstruction. The centres of the tibial and femoral tunnel apertures were correlated to measurement grid systems used as a radiographic reference.ResultsThe centre of the femoral tunnel aperture was located at 42.9% ± 9.4% of the total intercondylar depth and at 12.9% ± 7.2% of the total intercondylar height. The angle α for the femoral tunnel position was measured at 64.2° ± 10.0°. The centre of the tibial tunnel aperture was found at 51.8% ± 4.1% of the total mediolateral diameter of the tibial plateau. The superoinferior distance of the tibial tunnel aperture to the joint line was 9.6 mm ± 4.4 mm on frontal and 9.3 mm ± 3.4 mm on sagittal 3D-CT scans. The distance of the tibial tunnel aperture to the former physis line averaged to 0.8 mm ± 3.4 mm. Comparison to the corresponding reference values revealed no statistically significant difference.ConclusionArthroscopic tibial inlay reconstruction is an efficient procedure for precise replication of the anatomical footprint of the PCL.Level of evidenceIV, prospective case series
Journal: The Knee - Volume 21, Issue 6, December 2014, Pages 1198-1202