کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
6214070 | 1606046 | 2011 | 6 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |

ObjectiveIn recent years, new speech coding strategies have been developed with the aim of improving the transmission of temporal fine structure to cochlear implant recipients. This study reports on the implementation of one such strategy (fine structure processing, FSP) in children.MethodsThis was a prospective study investigating the upgrade to a new speech processor. The upgrade used a repeated measures design with an alternating order of conditions (A-B-A-B design). Twelve pre- and perilingually deaf children with MED-EL C40+ cochlear implants were enrolled in the study. Patients were upgraded from their Tempo+ speech processor, which used continuous interleaved sampling (CIS) in combination with a frequency spectrum of 200-8500Â Hz, to an Opus speech processor, which used FSP with an extended frequency spectrum of 70-8500Â Hz. The primary means of testing was an HSM (Hochmair, Schulz and Moser) sentence test at 65 and 80Â dB in quiet. In addition, the “Mainzer Kindersprachtest” (Mainz audiometric speech test for children) was applied at 65 and 70Â dB.ResultsWhen the new FSP speech processor was used together with the extended low frequency range, HSM sentence tests at 65 and 80Â dB resulted in scores indicating statisticially significant improvements of 7.1 and 9.9 percentage points, respectively. Scores in the “Mainzer Kindersprachtest” at 65 and 70Â dB indicated statistically significant improvements of 9.3 and 6.1 percentage points, respectively.ConclusionsThe present study clearly shows that children benefit from the fine structure speech coding strategy in combination with an extended frequency spectrum in the low frequencies, as is offered by the Opus speech processors. This should be taken into consideration when fitting pre- and perilingually deaf children implanted almost a decade previously.
Journal: International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology - Volume 75, Issue 4, April 2011, Pages 573-578