کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
6229754 1608119 2016 10 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Effective self-management strategies for bipolar disorder: A community-engaged Delphi Consensus Consultation study
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
راهکارهای خودکارآمدی موثر برای اختلال دوقطبی: مشارکت کلی در مورد مشارکت دلفی
کلمات کلیدی
اختلال دو قطبی، خود مدیریت، مشاوره انضباط دلفی، تحقیق مشارکتی مبتنی بر جامعه،
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت پزشکی و دندانپزشکی روانپزشکی و بهداشت روانی
چکیده انگلیسی


- Self-management strategies for stopping ascent into hypo/mania can be articulated.
- Patient and clinician opinions on effective self-management of BD are similar.
- Combining CBPR and Delphi Consensus Consultation methods has merit.

BackgroundSelf-management represents an important complement to psychosocial treatments for bipolar disorder (BD), but research is limited. Specifically, little is known about self-management approaches for elevated mood states; this study investigated self-management strategies for: (1) maintaining balance in mood, and (2) stopping progression into hypomania/mania.MethodsTo identify the common components of BD self-management, Delphi Consensus Consultation methods were combined with a Community-Based Participatory Research (CBPR) approach across five study phases: (1) Qualitative dataset content analysis; (2) Academic/grey literature reviews; (3) Content analysis; (4) Two Delphi rounds (rating strategies on a 5-point Likert scale, Very Unhelpful-Very Helpful), and; (5) Quantitative analysis and interpretation. Participants were people with BD and healthcare providers.ResultsPhases 1 and 2 identified 262 and 3940 candidate strategies, respectively; 3709 were discarded as duplicates/unintelligible. The remaining 493 were assessed via Delphi methods in Phase 4: 101 people with BD and 52 healthcare providers participated in Round 1; 83 of the BD panel (82%) and 43 of the healthcare provider panel (83%) participated in Round 2-exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was conducted on Round 2 results.LimitationsEFA was underpowered and sample was not ethnically diverse, limiting generalizability.DiscussionHigh concordance was observed in ratings of strategy effectiveness between the two panels. Future research could usefully investigate the provisional discovery here of underlying factors which link individual strategies. For example, 'maintaining hope' underpinned strategies for maintaining balance, and 'decreasing use of stimulants' underpinned strategies to interrupt hypo/manic ascent. There is merit in combining CBPR and Delphi methods.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Journal of Affective Disorders - Volume 206, December 2016, Pages 77-86
نویسندگان
, , , , , , , , , , ,