کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
6230651 1608135 2016 12 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Discriminant validity and gender differences in DSM-5 posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت پزشکی و دندانپزشکی روانپزشکی و بهداشت روانی
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
Discriminant validity and gender differences in DSM-5 posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms
چکیده انگلیسی


- Few studies have assessed discriminant validity and gender differences in PTSD.
- PTSD factors are associated with transdiagnostic factors and other correlates.
- Factor structure is gender invariant.
- Significant gender differences were observed for four DSM-5 PTSD symptoms.
- The findings provide support for the DSM-5, anhedonia and hybrid models.

BackgroundThe posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) literature is replete with investigations of factor structure, however, few empirical studies have examined discriminant validity and the moderating role of gender on factor structure and symptom expression. This study aimed to address these gaps.MethodsAn online, population-based study of 3175 Australian adults was conducted. This study analyzed data from 642 participants who reported a traumatic event. Overall, 10.2% (13.4% females, 7.6% males) met diagnostic criteria for current PTSD.ResultsConfirmatory factor analyses indicated that eight factor models provided excellent fit to the data. The DSM-5 model, anhedonia and hybrid models provided strong fit to the data, based on statistical fit indices and parsimony. The models' factors were significantly associated with a number of external correlates. Factor structure was gender invariant for the three models, albeit significant latent mean-level differences were apparent in relation to the intrusion/re-experiencing and alterations in arousal and reactivity factors. Bonferroni-adjusted Wald chi-square tests indicated significant gender differences in four DSM-5 PTSD symptoms: females reported significantly higher rates of negative beliefs, diminished interest, restricted affect and sleep disturbance symptoms compared to men.LimitationsResponse rate to the survey was low. However, the number of respondents who completed the survey was high and population weights were employed to account for self-selection biases and aid generalizability.ConclusionsThe findings provide support for the DSM-5, anhedonia and hybrid models compared to alternative models based on DSM-5 symptoms. Discriminant validity analyses indicated similar patterns of significant associations with the transdiagnostic factors, potentially suggesting that all the PTSD factors are related to non-specific distress. Further research investigating how gender influences PTSD symptom expression is warranted, including possible gender differences in symptom item interpretation.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Journal of Affective Disorders - Volume 190, 15 January 2016, Pages 56-67
نویسندگان
, , , , , , ,