Southwestern Surgical Congress“Blush at first sight”: significance of computed tomographic and angiographic discrepancy in patients with blunt abdominal trauma

- (CT) “blush” in solid organs after injury suggests active hemorrhage requiring angiography.
- If CT-angiographic discrepancy (no blush on angiography), a therapeutic dilemma exists.
- CT-angiographic discrepancy without embolization associated with twice the rate of rebleed.
- CT blush of the spleen or liver, a negative angiogram still carries risk of recurrent hemorrhage.
- Empiric embolization should be considered at the time of the initial procedure.

Background“Blush,” defined as a focal area of contrast pooling within a hematoma, is frequently encountered in patients with severe blunt torso trauma. Contemporary clinical practice guidelines recommend the use of angiography with embolization in all hemodynamically stable patients with evidence of active extravasation. Patients presenting with blush visualized on computed tomography (CT), but not demonstrated on subsequent angiography, present a challenging clinical dilemma. The purpose of this study was to study the natural course of patients with this blush disparity between CT and angiography.MethodsThe study was conducted as a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent angiography after initial CT scans revealed blush after blunt abdominal trauma at a level I trauma center (January 2005 to December 2014).ResultsA total of 143 patients with blunt splenic injuries were found to have CT blush and underwent catheter angiography. Of the 143 patients with blush on CT, 24 (17%) showed no evidence of blush on angiography. Patients with CT-angiographic discrepancy were more than twice as likely to rebleed compared with those with angiographic evidence of blush (25% vs 10%, P < .05). This is due to the fact that although all patients with blush on angiography underwent embolization, only 7/22 of those with no evidence of blush were embolized. Sixty-eight patients with blunt liver injuries demonstrated blush on CT and underwent catheter angiography. Of the 68 patients with blush on CT, 22 patients (33%) showed no evidence of blush on angiography. None of these 22 patients underwent angioembolization. The rebleeding rate in this cohort was 32% (7/22). Again, this was more than twice the rate observed in patients who did have angiographic evidence of blush and were embolized (11%, 5/46).ConclusionsCT imaging has enhanced our ability to detect contrast extravasation after injury, and evidence of blush on CT suggests the presence of active hemorrhage. This analysis suggests that in clinical situations in which CT blush is noted secondary to blunt trauma to the spleen or liver, a negative angiogram still carries a significant risk of recurrent hemorrhage; consideration for empiric embolization at the time of the initial procedure even in the absence of blush on angiographic evaluation is thus warranted. Prospective studies are needed to validate these findings and to assess the utility of this clinical paradigm.