کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
627554 1455467 2008 8 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
The removal of boron from model solutions and seawater using reverse osmosis membranes
موضوعات مرتبط
مهندسی و علوم پایه مهندسی شیمی تصفیه و جداسازی
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
The removal of boron from model solutions and seawater using reverse osmosis membranes
چکیده انگلیسی

The main objective of this work was to investigate and compare the removals of boron from model solutions (boron as single solute in distilled and deionized water) and seawater using two commercial high rejection SWRO membranes. The impacts of dissolved solids in seawater and pH on boron rejection and permeate flux were determined. A lab-scale cross-flow flat-sheet configuration test unit was used for all RO experiments. Much higher boron rejections were obtained in model solutions than seawater at a pH of 8.2, while boron rejections >98% were consistently achieved at pH 10.5 by both membranes in model solutions and seawater. Consistent for both pH levels, lower permeate flux values were observed in seawater than model solutions at constant conditions due to much higher osmotic pressures in seawater. Increasing pH from 8.2 to 10.5 decreased the flux values in seawater at constant membrane pressure, mainly due to membrane fouling and enhanced scale formation by Mg and Ca compounds. As the pressure was increased from 41.3 to 55.2 bar higher boron rejections were observed in seawater. High salinity levels in seawater reduced the rejection of boron by SWRO membranes compared to rejection of boron as single solute. On the other hand, by enhancing boron rejections due to a shift towards charged boron species, increasing seawater pH to 10.5 compensated the negative impacts of dissolved solids in the seawater on boron rejections. However, such advantages of increase in pH occurred at the expense of reduced permeate flux.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Desalination - Volume 223, Issues 1–3, 1 March 2008, Pages 126-133