کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
635161 | 1456088 | 2012 | 5 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
![عکس صفحه اول مقاله: Nanoscale analysis of hydrophilicity–hydrophobicity distribution on inner surfaces of wet dialysis membranes by atomic force microscopy Nanoscale analysis of hydrophilicity–hydrophobicity distribution on inner surfaces of wet dialysis membranes by atomic force microscopy](/preview/png/635161.png)
Because protein adsorption depends significantly on the hydrophilicity–hydrophobicity of surfaces, it is important to evaluate nanoscale surface properties for improvement of the biocompatibility of dialysis membranes. The objective of the present study is to establish a nanoscale analytical method, which is independent of the test environment, for determining the hydrophilicity–hydrophobicity distribution on the inner surfaces of dialysis membranes. The hydrophobic adhesive forces to the wet dialysis membrane inner surfaces were determined using a hydrophobized atomic force microscopy probe, and the hydrophilicity–hydrophobicity distribution on the surfaces was visualized two-dimensionally at the nanoscale level. In addition, the relative intensity of hydrophobicity was examined by determining the ratio of the adhesive force to the test membrane inner surfaces to that to hydrophobized mica. The polysulfone (PSf) and polyester polymer alloy (PEPA) dialysis membranes decreased relative intensity of hydrophobicity on the inner surface with the addition of polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP). The PEPA membrane inner surface had a more uniform hydrophilicity–hydrophobicity distribution with the PVP addition. On the other hand, the distribution on the PSf membrane inner surface remained uneven despite PVP addition. Our results demonstrate that it is possible to evaluate the hydrophilicity–hydrophobicity distributions on the surfaces of wet dialysis membranes using a hydrophobized probe.
► We evaluate hydrophobicity on dialysis membrane inner surfaces at the nanoscale.
► Adhesive forces of the membranes were measured by a hydrophobized AFM probe.
► The forces were mapped to determine hydrophilicity–hydrophobicity distribution.
► The distribution of PEPA membrane surface was more uniform with addition of PVP.
► The distribution of PSf membrane surface was uneven despite PVP adding.
Journal: Journal of Membrane Science - Volume 396, 1 April 2012, Pages 38–42