کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
6386443 1627028 2015 12 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Contribution of the finite volume point dilution method for measurement of groundwater fluxes in a fractured aquifer
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
مشارکت روش رقت محدود نقطه حجم برای اندازه گیری شارهای آبهای زیرزمینی در آبخوان شکسته
کلمات کلیدی
روش رقت حجم نقطه محدود شارژ آب زیرزمینی تجزیه و تحلیل عدم قطعیت، دو بسته آزمون تک تست، آبخوان خرد شده،
موضوعات مرتبط
مهندسی و علوم پایه علوم زمین و سیارات فرآیندهای سطح زمین
چکیده انگلیسی


- Two single well techniques are compared in a fractured aquifer.
- First FVPDM using a double packer setup and in a fractured aquifer.
- A full length FVPDM is more precise at estimating groundwater fluxes than a PDM.
- The precision of a PDM fully relies on external estimation of the mixing volume.

Measurement of groundwater fluxes is the basis of all hydrogeological study, from hydraulic characterization to the most advanced reactive transport modeling. Usual groundwater flux estimation with Darcy's law may lead to cumulated errors on spatial variability, especially in fractured aquifers where local direct measurement of groundwater fluxes becomes necessary.In the present study, both classical point dilution method (PDM) and finite volume point dilution method (FVPDM) are compared on the fractured crystalline aquifer of Ploemeur, France. The manipulation includes the first use of the FVPDM in a fractured aquifer using a double packer. This configuration limits the vertical extent of the tested zone to target a precise fracture zone of the aquifer. The result of this experiment is a continuous monitoring of groundwater fluxes that lasted for more than 4 days.Measurements of groundwater flow rate in the fracture (Qt) by PDM provide good estimates only if the mixing volume (Vw) (volume of water in which the tracer is mixed) is precisely known. Conversely, the FVPDM allows for an independent estimation of Vw and Qt, leading to better precision in case of complex experimental setup such as the one used. The precision of a PDM does not rely on the duration of the experiment while a FVPDM may require long experimental duration to guarantees a good precision.Classical PDM should then be used for rapid estimation of groundwater flux using simple experimental setup. On the other hand, the FVPDM is a more precise method that has a great potential for development but may require longer duration experiment to achieve a good precision if the groundwater fluxes investigated are low and/or the mixing volume is large.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Journal of Contaminant Hydrology - Volume 182, November 2015, Pages 244-255
نویسندگان
, , , , , , ,