کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
6433230 | 1636069 | 2013 | 14 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |

- Five main lithofacies associations were defined in the RÃo Chico Formation.
- Lateral/vertical changes in fluvial architecture of the unit were recognized.
- Fluvial architecture shows two main scenarios: low and high-accommodation settings.
- Extensional reactivation of pre-existing faults generated differential subsidence.
The Upper Paleocene RÃo Chico Formation is a 50-180Â m thick fluvial succession developed in a passive-margin setting, Golfo San Jorge basin, Central Patagonia, Argentina. A detailed description and interpretation of outcrops was carried out, analyzing exposures from the northern basin margin to the most complete successions at the southern depocenter. The unit is characterized by a regional fluvial system that flowed to the south-east. Five main lithofacies associations were defined: (I) active fluvial channels, with three sub-types: braided, meandering and low-sinuosity, (II) sheet-flood deposits, (III) proximal floodplain (natural levee and crevasse-splay), (IV) distal floodplain, and (V) abandoned channels.Lateral/vertical changes in fluvial architecture of the RÃo Chico Formation were recognized by variations in preserved thickness, fluvial styles, geometry of fluvial channels, regional paleoflow directions, and channel/floodplain ratios. Close to the northern basin margin, the fluvial succession is 50-60Â m thick, composed of braided channels, sheet-flow deposits, and high channel/floodplain ratio. In a basinward direction, the alluvial succession increases to 180Â m in thickness, the dominant fluvial styles change to low-sinuosity and meandering channels and channel/floodplain ratio reduces.The fluvial architecture of the RÃo Chico Formation shows two main depositional trends that resulted from changes in accommodation space across the basin. The interpreted break-point coincides with the underlying Cretaceous basin-boundary, thus the synsedimentary extensional reactivation of the pre-existing tectonic lineament generated differential subsidence, delimiting two different accommodation settings.
151
Journal: Sedimentary Geology - Volume 294, 15 August 2013, Pages 342-355