کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
6688049 | 501884 | 2015 | 13 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
A comparison of electric power output of CO2 Plume Geothermal (CPG) and brine geothermal systems for varying reservoir conditions
دانلود مقاله + سفارش ترجمه
دانلود مقاله ISI انگلیسی
رایگان برای ایرانیان
کلمات کلیدی
موضوعات مرتبط
مهندسی و علوم پایه
مهندسی انرژی
مهندسی انرژی و فناوری های برق
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
چکیده انگلیسی
In contrast to conventional hydrothermal systems or enhanced geothermal systems, CO2 Plume Geothermal (CPG) systems generate electricity by using CO2 that has been geothermally heated due to sequestration in a sedimentary basin. Four CPG and two brine-based geothermal systems are modeled to estimate their power production for sedimentary basin reservoir depths between 1 and 5 km, geothermal temperature gradients from 20 to 50 °C kmâ1, reservoir permeabilities from 1 Ã 10â15 to 1 Ã 10â12 m2 and well casing inner diameters from 0.14 m to 0.41 m. Results show that CPG direct-type systems produce more electricity than brine-based geothermal systems at depths between 2 and 3 km, and at permeabilities between 10â14 and 10â13 m2, often by a factor of two. This better performance of CPG is due to the low kinematic viscosity of CO2, relative to brine at those depths, and the strong thermosiphon effect generated by CO2. When CO2 is used instead of R245fa as the secondary working fluid in an organic Rankine cycle (ORC), the power production of both the CPG and the brine-reservoir system increases substantially; for example, by 22% and 20% for subsurface brine and CO2 systems, respectively, with a 35 °C kmâ1 thermal gradient, 0.27 m production and 0.41 m injection well diameters, and 5 Ã 10â14 m2 reservoir permeability.
ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Applied Energy - Volume 140, 15 February 2015, Pages 365-377
Journal: Applied Energy - Volume 140, 15 February 2015, Pages 365-377
نویسندگان
Benjamin M. Adams, Thomas H. Kuehn, Jeffrey M. Bielicki, Jimmy B. Randolph, Martin O. Saar,