کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
6729912 | 504005 | 2016 | 10 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Greenhouse gas mitigation benefits and cost-effectiveness of weatherization treatments for low-income, American, urban housing stocks
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
مزایای کاهش گازهای گلخانه ای و اثربخشی هزینه های درمان آهسته سازی برای سهام کم درآمد، آمریکایی، مسکن شهری
دانلود مقاله + سفارش ترجمه
دانلود مقاله ISI انگلیسی
رایگان برای ایرانیان
کلمات کلیدی
American Housing SurveyWAPProgrammable thermostatGHGMSAU.S.AHSCO2eACH50Weatherization - آب و هواEnergy information administration - اداره اطلاعات انرژیGreenhouse gas emissions - انتشار گازهای گلخانه ایHES - او هستUnited States - ایالات متحده آمریکاEIA - اینEnergy efficiency - بهره وری انرژیCost-benefit analysis - تحلیل هزینه-فایده Carbon dioxide - دیاکسید کربنBuilding energy modeling - مدل سازی انرژی ساختمانLow-income housing - مسکن کم درآمدCarbon dioxide equivalent - معادل دی اکسید کربنMetropolitan statistical area - منطقه آماری MetropolitanPascal - پاسکالCO2 - کربن دیاکسیدGreenhouse gas - گاز گلخانه ایgigajoule - گججول
موضوعات مرتبط
مهندسی و علوم پایه
مهندسی انرژی
انرژی های تجدید پذیر، توسعه پایدار و محیط زیست
چکیده انگلیسی
This paper investigates how greenhouse gas (GHG) mitigation benefits and cost-effectiveness of weatherization treatments vary geographically due to differences in climate, energy production mix, and housing stock. Using a treatment cost database and methods that estimate the residential energy savings from weatherization, we estimated energy cost savings, GHG savings, and measurements of cost-effectiveness. Combinations of three weatherization treatments were modeled: replacing a standard thermostat with a programmable thermostat, installing attic insulation, and envelop air sealing. These treatments were modeled for the low-income housing stock of six contrasting American urban areas: Orlando, Florida; Los Angeles-Long Beach, California; Seattle, Washington; Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Detroit, Michigan; and Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Results show that (1) regional variations have high impact on the cost-effectiveness of weatherization treatments, (2) housing stocks with substantial electric space conditioning tend to offer greater energy cost and GHG savings, (3) the effect of a GHG price is small compared to energy cost savings when evaluating the cost-effectiveness of weatherization treatments, and (4) installing programmable thermostats is the most cost-effective treatment. This study highlights the importance of thoughtful consideration of weatherization program goals when selecting cities or regions to prioritize because different goals suggest different weatherization strategies.
ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Energy and Buildings - Volume 128, 15 September 2016, Pages 911-920
Journal: Energy and Buildings - Volume 128, 15 September 2016, Pages 911-920
نویسندگان
Jonathan L. Bradshaw, Elie Bou-Zeid, Robert H. Harris,