کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
6831490 | 1434314 | 2018 | 11 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Comparing the outcomes of two different approaches to CEFR-based rating of students' writing performances across two European countries
دانلود مقاله + سفارش ترجمه
دانلود مقاله ISI انگلیسی
رایگان برای ایرانیان
کلمات کلیدی
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم انسانی و اجتماعی
علوم انسانی و هنر
زبان و زبان شناسی
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
![عکس صفحه اول مقاله: Comparing the outcomes of two different approaches to CEFR-based rating of students' writing performances across two European countries Comparing the outcomes of two different approaches to CEFR-based rating of students' writing performances across two European countries](/preview/png/6831490.png)
چکیده انگلیسی
Although there were individual differences in rater severity among both teams of raters, a clear pattern emerged from the data: The Austrian raters were slightly more lenient than the Finnish raters. Although there was a statistically significant difference in rater severity between the two groups, the actual scope of disagreement was small. Thus, overall, the two teams agreed to a large extent on the CEFR levels of the participants.
ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Assessing Writing - Volume 37, July 2018, Pages 57-67
Journal: Assessing Writing - Volume 37, July 2018, Pages 57-67
نویسندگان
Franz Holzknecht, Ari Huhta, Iasonas Lamprianou,