Real indentation hardness of nano-polycrystalline cBN synthesized by direct conversion sintering under HPHT

• We investigate indentation hardness of nano-polycrystalline cBN.
• Nano-polycrystals consisting of smaller cBN grains increase the elastic recovery of indentations.
• Vickers hardness values of the nano-polycrystalline cBN reported are incorrect, attributable to the elastic recovery.
• The real hardness of the nano-polycrystalline cBN accurately evaluated by Knoop indantation is around 45 GPa.

The hardness characteristic of nano-polycrystalline cBN synthesized by direct conversion sintering was thoroughly investigated using Vickers and Knoop indenters. It was found that nano-polycrystals consisting of smaller cBN grains increase the elastic recovery of indentations during unloading of the indenters and the diagonal of Vickers indentations and the minor diagonal of Knoop indentations significantly decrease in length. Thus, if a Vickers indenter is used, the apparent hardness value increases, making it impossible to perform an accurate evaluation, e.g. incorrect Vickers hardness values in excess of 80 GPa were obtained from nano-polycrystalline cBN with a grain size of 50 nm or less. On the other hand, it was verified that a Knoop indenter ensures an accurate hardness evaluation even if the constituent grains are fine because its major diagonal length which is used for measurement is less susceptible to elastic recovery. In an accurate evaluation of the hardness of different types of nano-polycrystalline cBN using a Knoop indenter, the hardness of each type of cBN was around 45 GPa, and there was no clear Hall–Petch relationship between hardness and grain size without a slight bell-like correlation. These results suggest that reported hardness values higher than 80 GPa of similar nano-polycrystalline cBN evaluated using a Vickers indenter are incorrect values caused by elastic recovery occurring at the indentation.