کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
743587 894363 2008 7 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Evaluation of peach quality indices using an electronic nose by MLR, QPST and BP network
موضوعات مرتبط
مهندسی و علوم پایه شیمی شیمی آنالیزی یا شیمی تجزیه
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
Evaluation of peach quality indices using an electronic nose by MLR, QPST and BP network
چکیده انگلیسی

In this paper, responses of a gas sensor array were employed to establish a quality indices model evaluating the peach quality indices. The relationship between sensor signals and the firmness, the content of sugar (CS) and acidity of “Dabai” peach were developed using multiple linear regressions with stepwise procedure, quadratic polynomial step regression (QPST) and back-propagation network. The results showed that the multiple linear regression model represented good ability in predicting of quality indices, with high correlation coefficients (R2 = 0.87 for penetrating force CF; R2 = 0.79 for content of sugar CS; R2 = 0.81 for pH) and relatively low average percent errors (ERR) (9.66%, 7.68% and 3.6% for CF, CS and pH, respectively). The quadratic polynomial step regression provides an accurate quality indices model, with high correlation (R2 = 0.92, 0.87, 0.83 for CF, CS and pH, respectively) between predicted and measured values and a relatively low error (5.47%, 3.45%, 2.57% for CF, CS and pH, respectively) for prediction. The feed-forward neural network also provides an accurate quality indices model with a high correlation (R2 = 0.90, 0.81, 0.87 for CF, CS and pH, respectively) between predicted and measured values and a relatively low average percent error (6.39%, 6.21%, 3.13% for CF, CS and pH, respectively) for prediction. These results prove that the electronic nose has the potential of becoming a reliable instrument to assess the peach quality indices.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical - Volume 134, Issue 1, 28 August 2008, Pages 332–338
نویسندگان
, , , ,