Institutional constraints for adaptive capacity to climate change in Flevoland's agriculture

The two main constraining CIPs for the implementation of the measures were found to be (1) heterogeneity of actors' interests and (2) availability of resources. Based on the institutional feasibility analysis, the implementation of water management and improvement of irrigation facilities will potentially face fewer institutional constraints compared to the other two measures. We conclude that our approach proves applicable for institutional analyses of adaptation measures for current and future (climate) challenges at different levels of implementation, but that more applications are needed to test its validity and robustness.