کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
7588568 | 1492082 | 2016 | 9 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Optimized combination of dilution and refined QuEChERS to overcome matrix effects of six types of tea for determination eight neonicotinoid insecticides by ultra performance liquid chromatography-electrospray tandem mass spectrometry
دانلود مقاله + سفارش ترجمه
دانلود مقاله ISI انگلیسی
رایگان برای ایرانیان
کلمات کلیدی
موضوعات مرتبط
مهندسی و علوم پایه
شیمی
شیمی آنالیزی یا شیمی تجزیه
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
![عکس صفحه اول مقاله: Optimized combination of dilution and refined QuEChERS to overcome matrix effects of six types of tea for determination eight neonicotinoid insecticides by ultra performance liquid chromatography-electrospray tandem mass spectrometry Optimized combination of dilution and refined QuEChERS to overcome matrix effects of six types of tea for determination eight neonicotinoid insecticides by ultra performance liquid chromatography-electrospray tandem mass spectrometry](/preview/png/7588568.png)
چکیده انگلیسی
Liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry (LC-ESI-MS/MS) is a primary tool for analysis of low volatility compounds in complex matrices. However, complex matrices, such as different types of tea, complicate analysis through ionization suppression or enhancement. In this study, sample preparation by a refined QuEChERS method combined with a dilution strategy removed almost all matrix effects caused by six types of tea. Tea samples were soaked with water and extracted with acetonitrile, cleaned up with a combination of PVPP (160 mg) and GCB (20 mg), and dried. Dried extracts were diluted with 20 mL acetonitrile/water (15:85, v/v) before analysis by UPLC-MS/MS. The average recoveries of eight neonicotinoid insecticides (dinotefuran, nitenpyram, thiamethoxam, imidacloprid, clothianidin, imidaclothiz, acetamiprid, and thiacloprid) ranged from 66.3 to 108.0% from tea samples spiked at 0.01-0.5 mg kgâ1. Relative standard deviations were below 16% for all recovery tests. The limit of quantification ranged from 0.01 to 0.05 mg kgâ1.
ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Food Chemistry - Volume 210, 1 November 2016, Pages 26-34
Journal: Food Chemistry - Volume 210, 1 November 2016, Pages 26-34
نویسندگان
Weiting Jiao, Yu Xiao, Xiaosan Qian, Mengmeng Tong, Yizheng Hu, Ruyan Hou, Rimao Hua,