کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
777703 | 1463781 | 2013 | 10 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |

Several standard tests have been widely used for evaluating the pipe grade polyethylene with respect to toughness and lifetime. However, some of these tests turn to be not adequate for new generation of high performance pipe grade polyethylene: the testing takes extremely long time, which makes it impractical. Recently, it has been proposed to use the circular notched specimen (CNS) for studying the crack growth resistance of pipe grade polyethylene. In CNS the stress intensity factor (SIF) increases with crack size much faster than in commonly used test specimens like compact tension (CT) specimen for instance. Thus, CNS may be a good candidate for an accelerated testing as long as it allows reproducing the mechanisms of slow crack growth (SCG) in field conditions. The objectives of the present studies are twofold: (1) to compare pipe grade polyethylene materials with respect to fracture resistance using CNS in order to complete the program in a relatively short time; and (2) to evaluate the applicability of CNS for studies of slow crack growth kinetics. Fatigue crack growth resistance of four PE resins is evaluated in this work. The fracture surfaces after CNS failure, are analyzed by means of optical and scanning electron microscopy (OM and SEM) in order to determine the mechanism of SCG. The effect of load level, stress ratio (R) and notch depth is also studied using CNS. In addition, some technical issues associated with CNS testing are discussed.
► A new test method on evaluating the crack behavior of PE is developed.
► Interpreted test results are compared and discussed with conventional PENT data.
► The ranking of the resistance to crack initiation/growth of samples is provided.
► The effect of the molecular structure of PE on the crack behavior is discussed.
► Some very critical technical issues with CNS during tests are discussed.
Journal: International Journal of Fatigue - Volume 51, June 2013, Pages 26–35