کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
8106129 | 1522170 | 2014 | 10 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Optimization of environmental benefits of carbon mineralization technologies for biogas upgrading
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
بهینه سازی از مزایای زیست محیطی فناوری های کانی سازی کربن برای ارتقای بیوگاز
دانلود مقاله + سفارش ترجمه
دانلود مقاله ISI انگلیسی
رایگان برای ایرانیان
کلمات کلیدی
PSAHPWSMSWIAPCGHGCEDOPs - OP هاLife Cycle Assessment - ارزیابی چرخه عمر یا چرخه حیاتBiogas - بیوگازcumulative energy demand - تقاضای انرژی تجمعیCleaner production - تولید تمیزکنندهMembrane separation - جداسازی غشاءCryogenic separation - جدایی کریوژنیکpressure swing adsorption - جذب نوسان فشارBottom ash - خاکستر پایینMunicipal solid waste incinerator - زباله سایشی زباله شهریAWR - ساعتCarbon capture - ضبط کربنorganic matter - ماده آلیAir pollution control residues - مانده های کنترل آلودگی هواAcidification Potential - پتانسیل اسیدی شدنCarbon mineralization - کانی سازی کربنGreenhouse gas - گاز گلخانه ایCry - گریه کردن
موضوعات مرتبط
مهندسی و علوم پایه
مهندسی انرژی
انرژی های تجدید پذیر، توسعه پایدار و محیط زیست
چکیده انگلیسی
Carbon mineralization is a promising process for carbon dioxide (CO2) capture and storage, and it can also be applied for biogas upgrading. This paper uses a life cycle assessment to identify possible methods of improving and reducing the environmental impact of novel biogas upgrading technologies. The two novel pilot-scale technologies that are assessed are alkaline absorption with regeneration (AwR) process and bottom ash for biogas upgrading (BABIU) process. These technologies are still at the pilot-plant scale, which offers the opportunity to identify how their environmental impact can be reduced before industrial-scale production occurs. The AwR technology uses an alkaline solution of either potassium hydroxide or sodium hydroxide to capture the CO2 and air pollution control residues to regenerate the solution. The BABIU process uses bottom ash (BA) from municipal solid waste incinerators to capture CO2 in a direct gas/solid contact process. For the AwR process, focus was placed on the reuse of wastewater (air pollution control residues require pre- and post-washing steps) and reagent type and concentration. Further improvements have focused on reagent and electricity use in AwR and the transport of BA for BABIU. The lowest environmental impact for AwR resulted when NaOH and in-process wastewater was reused. Even in such a process setting, AwR still has a higher environmental impact in 11 of 12 categories compared to other conventional biogas upgrading processes. On average, the BABIU process has a 73% lower impact than AwR and is comparable to conventional technologies.
ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Journal of Cleaner Production - Volume 76, 1 August 2014, Pages 32-41
Journal: Journal of Cleaner Production - Volume 76, 1 August 2014, Pages 32-41
نویسندگان
Katherine Starr, Laura Talens Peiro, Lidia Lombardi, Xavier Gabarrell, Gara Villalba,