Contribution à l'étude critique de l'œuvre homéopathique de JT Kent

The importance of James T. Kent in the present homeopathic world can't be denied. There are many homeopaths who, refering to his principles, describe themselves as « hahnemannians ». It's important to understand how much the following of Kent's principles means follow those of Hahnemann. In what extent did Kent interpreted Hahnemanns's texts? Which impact has a philosophy with a type of religion (the Swedenborgian) on the medical concepts that Hahnemann created? The comparaison between Kent's (but also Swedenborg's) textes and those of Hahnemann give some interesting remarks.