Mechanical analysis of cranial distractor attachment with three different resorbable fixation systems

We evaluated the suitability of CRSs, HAPs and UAPs for the cranial distractor fixation in a laboratory setting with a mechanical testing machine. Fracture tests were conducted in two directions with respect to the longitudinal axis; vertical i.e. axial pull-out strength, and horizontal i.e. shear strength. Mean maximum pull-out strength for CRS, HAP and UAP was 48.9 N, 32.5 N and 14.7 N, respectively. Mean maximum shear strength for CRS, HAP and UAP was 40.8 N, 77.9 N and 38.9 N, respectively. According to our in vitro tests, the cranial distractor attachment with four CRSs or six HAPs per footplate would provide sufficient fixation stability.