کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
8836646 | 1612595 | 2018 | 6 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Minimally invasive versus full sternotomy aortic valve replacement in low-risk patients: Which will stand against transcatheter aortic valve replacement?
دانلود مقاله + سفارش ترجمه
دانلود مقاله ISI انگلیسی
رایگان برای ایرانیان
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت
پزشکی و دندانپزشکی
عمل جراحی
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
![عکس صفحه اول مقاله: Minimally invasive versus full sternotomy aortic valve replacement in low-risk patients: Which will stand against transcatheter aortic valve replacement? Minimally invasive versus full sternotomy aortic valve replacement in low-risk patients: Which will stand against transcatheter aortic valve replacement?](/preview/png/8836646.png)
چکیده انگلیسی
In low-risk patients, minimally invasive aortic valve replacement results in similar mortality, stroke, reoperation rates for bleeding, and midterm survival (after adjusting for confounders), but shorter hospital length of stay and a trend (Pâ¯=â¯.075) toward shorter intensive care unit stay, compared to full sternotomy aortic valve replacement. Therefore, minimally invasive aortic valve replacement should stand as a benchmark against transcatheter aortic valve replacement in these patients.
ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Surgery - Volume 164, Issue 2, August 2018, Pages 282-287
Journal: Surgery - Volume 164, Issue 2, August 2018, Pages 282-287
نویسندگان
Sameer A. MD, Masaki MD, Jiyae BS, Fernando MD, MPH, Ahmed A. MD, Siobhan BS, Marc P. MD, MSc, Sary MD, Prem S. MD, Tsuyoshi MD,