کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
888630 | 913557 | 2013 | 17 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
A reasoning strategy is iterative when the initial conclusion suggested by a set of premises is integrated into that set of premises in order to yield additional conclusions. Previous experimental studies on game theory-based strategic games (such as the beauty contest game) observed difficulty in reasoning iteratively, which has been partly attributed to bounded individual rationality. However, this difficulty has also been attributed to problems in adequately representing the beliefs, actions, and goals of other agents involved in the games. In four experiments, we observed similar difficulties in iterative reasoning in a variety of puzzles and games that did not involve social interactions with other agents, where they can only be caused by individual cognitive boundaries. Our findings are consistent with the hypothesis that an intrinsic difficulty in iterative reasoning originates from a tendency not to revise our initial mental representation of a problem in light of the initial conclusions that it implies.
► Iteration and recursion are fundamental to human rationality and consciousness.
► However, spontaneous reasoning does not iterate for more than a few cycles.
► Limitations were previously observed in social settings and tasks.
► We experimentally observed similar limitations in many non-social tasks.
► Limitations stem from a tendency not to revise the initial model of a problem.
Journal: Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes - Volume 121, Issue 1, May 2013, Pages 24–40