کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
891264 914030 2012 6 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Attentional bias towards angry faces in trait-reappraisal
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم زیستی و بیوفناوری علم عصب شناسی علوم اعصاب رفتاری
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
Attentional bias towards angry faces in trait-reappraisal
چکیده انگلیسی

Emotion regulation (ER) strategies differ in when and how they influence emotion experience, expression, and concomitant cognition. However, no study to date has directly compared cognition in individuals who have a clear disposition for either cognitive or behavioural ER strategies. The present study compared selective attention to angry faces in groups of high trait-suppressors (people who are hiding emotional reactions in response to emotional challenge) and high trait-reappraisers (people who cognitively reinterpret emotional events). Since reappraisers are also low trait-anxious and suppressors are high trait-anxious, high and low anxious control groups, both being low in trait-ER, were also included. Attention to angry faces was assessed using an emotional dot-probe task. Trait-reappraisers and high-anxious individuals both showed attentional biases towards angry faces. Trait-reappraisers’ vigilance for angry faces was significantly more pronounced compared to both trait-suppressors and low anxious controls. We suggest that threat prioritization in high trait-reappraisal may allow deeper cognitive processing of threat information without being associated with psychological maladjustment.


► We compared attention to angry faces in trait-suppressors and trait-reappraisers.
► Reappraisers were vigilant for angry faces, similar to high anxious controls.
► Reappraisers were more threat-vigilant than suppressors and low anxious controls.
► This threat-vigilance may allow deeper processing of threat in reappraisers.
► Reappraisers likely exhibit threat-vigilance without psychological maladjustment.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Personality and Individual Differences - Volume 52, Issue 1, January 2012, Pages 61–66
نویسندگان
, ,