کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
892519 | 914085 | 2007 | 4 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Celebrating a common finding: Riding’s CSA test is unreliable
دانلود مقاله + سفارش ترجمه
دانلود مقاله ISI انگلیسی
رایگان برای ایرانیان
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم زیستی و بیوفناوری
علم عصب شناسی
علوم اعصاب رفتاری
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله

چکیده انگلیسی
This paper is a reply to Redmond and colleagues’ brief report that argues we (Peterson et al., 2003a) were not the first to establish the unreliability of the computerised cognitive styles analysis (CSA) test because we used a copy of the test rather than the original. We refute this suggestion and argue that we have already defended our approach to testing the CSA’s reliability (Peterson et al., 2003b) and that our method is entirely appropriate and transparent. Rather than argue over who was the first to test the CSA’s reliability, we believe we should celebrate the fact that we both found the same result, regardless of the method used.
ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Personality and Individual Differences - Volume 43, Issue 8, December 2007, Pages 2309–2312
Journal: Personality and Individual Differences - Volume 43, Issue 8, December 2007, Pages 2309–2312
نویسندگان
Elizabeth R. Peterson, Ian J. Deary, Elizabeth J. Austin,