کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
903740 916589 2011 9 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of cognitive–behavioral therapy for tinnitus distress
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت پزشکی و دندانپزشکی روانپزشکی و بهداشت روانی
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of cognitive–behavioral therapy for tinnitus distress
چکیده انگلیسی

Tinnitus is defined as a sound in the ear(s) and/or head without external origin and is a serious health concern for millions worldwide. The aim of the present study was to determine whether Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT) is effective in reducing distress associated with tinnitus. Randomized, controlled trials that assessed the efficacy of CBT for tinnitus-related distress in adults were identified by searching electronic databases (PsychINFO, PubMed, the Cochrane Library), and by manual searches. Fifteen studies (total of 1091 participants) were included in the meta-analysis. CBT compared with a passive and active control at post-assessment yielded statistically significant mean effect sizes for tinnitus-specific measures (Hedges's g = 0.70, and Hedges's g = 0.44, respectively). The average weighted pre-to-follow-up effect size for the CBT group suggested that these effects were maintained over time. Smaller but yet statistically significant effects of CBT were found for mood outcome measures. Characteristics of the studies were unrelated to effect sizes. Methodological rigor, publication bias, and a series of sensitivity analyses did not influence the findings. The results suggest that CBT is an effective treatment of tinnitus distress. However, caution is warranted given that few large-scale, well-controlled trials were identified.

Research Highlights
► Fifteen randomized, controlled trials of CBT for tinnitus distress were synthesized.
► Cognitive behavior therapy was more effective than controls at post-treatment.
► Effects were maintained at follow-up and were robust.
► Effects were unrelated to the characteristics of the studies.
► Few large-scale, well-controlled trials were identified.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Clinical Psychology Review - Volume 31, Issue 4, June 2011, Pages 545–553
نویسندگان
, , , ,