The development and validation of the Physical Appearance Comparison Scale-Revised (PACS-R)

• EFA/CFA resulted in an 11-item scale assessing comparisons in a range of contexts.
• PACS-R scores demonstrated excellent reliability in a sample of college women.
• PACS-R was correlated with body satisfaction, disordered eating, and self-esteem.
• PACS-R is a reliable and valid tool for assessing appearance comparisons in women.

The Physical Appearance Comparison Scale (PACS; Thompson, Heinberg, & Tantleff, 1991) was revised to assess appearance comparisons relevant to women and men in a wide variety of contexts. The revised scale (Physical Appearance Comparison Scale-Revised, PACS-R) was administered to 1176 college females. In Study 1, exploratory factor analysis and parallel analysis using one half of the sample suggested a single factor structure for the PACS-R. Study 2 utilized the remaining half of the sample to conduct confirmatory factor analysis, item analysis, and to examine the convergent validity of the scale. These analyses resulted in an 11-item measure that demonstrated excellent internal consistency and convergent validity with measures of body satisfaction, eating pathology, sociocultural influences on appearance, and self-esteem. Regression analyses demonstrated the utility of the PACS-R in predicting body satisfaction and eating pathology. Overall, results indicate that the PACS-R is a reliable and valid tool for assessing appearance comparison tendencies in women.