Referring expressions and structural language abilities in children with specific language impairment: A pragmatic tolerance account

• We tested production, comprehension and metalinguistic judgment abilities in SLI vs. TD children.
• Children with SLI produced more under-informative expressions and comprehension errors.
• Children with SLI detected yet showed less sensitivity to under-informative expressions.
• Results suggest that children with SLI are sensitive yet tolerant to pragmatic infelicities.
• We conclude that structural language ability is a key factor in pragmatics.

Specific language impairment (SLI) has traditionally been characterized as a deficit of structural language (specifically grammar), with relative strengths in pragmatics. In this study, comprehensive assessment of production, comprehension, and metalinguistic judgment of referring expressions revealed that children with SLI have weaknesses in both structural and pragmatic language skills relative to age-matched peers. Correlational analyses highlight a relationship between their performance on the experimental tasks and their structural language ability. Despite their poor performance on the production and comprehension tasks, children with SLI were able to recognize pragmatically under-informative reference relative to other types of utterance, although they imposed a less severe penalty on such expressions than typically developing peers, a pattern that supports the pragmatic tolerance account. Our novel methodology (which probed structural abilities from both the speaker’s and hearer’s perspectives as well as metalinguistic and pragmatic skills in the same sample) challenges the assumption that pragmatic errors stem from deficits in social cognition and instead supports recent findings suggesting that when the impact of structural language is isolated, pragmatic deficits may be resolved.