کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
9436639 | 1615695 | 2005 | 12 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions recorded using maximum length sequences from patients with sensorineural hearing loss
دانلود مقاله + سفارش ترجمه
دانلود مقاله ISI انگلیسی
رایگان برای ایرانیان
کلمات کلیدی
RMSSNRSNHLTEOAEPOEMSrnllnLHearing loss - از دست دادن شنواییEvoked otoacoustic emissions - انتشارات otoacoustic موجب شدMaximum length sequences - توالی حداکثر طولMaximum length sequence - حداکثر دنباله طولroot-mean-square - ریشه متوسط مربعMLs - میلی لیترsignal to noise ratio - نسبت سیگنال به نویزsensorineural hearing loss - کم شنوایی حسی عصبیTransient evoked otoacoustic emissions - گذار ناشی از انتشار otoacoustic
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم زیستی و بیوفناوری
علم عصب شناسی
سیستم های حسی
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله

چکیده انگلیسی
Much research has shown that transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs) can successfully separate normally hearing and hearing impaired populations. However, this finding comes from TEOAEs recorded using conventional averaging at low stimulation rates. Presenting clicks according to maximum length sequences (MLSs) enables TEOAEs to be recorded at very high stimulation rates. This study compares conventional and MLS TEOAEs in normally hearing and hearing impaired adults. Stimulus presentation rates of 40 clicks/s (conventional) and 5000 clicks/s (MLS) were used. The 'linear' TEOAEs (i.e., the directly recorded waveforms), the 'level nonlinear' (LNL) TEOAEs (i.e., those derived from two linear waveforms separated by a known difference in stimulus level) and the 'rate nonlinear' (RNL) TEOAEs (i.e., obtained by subtracting the emission recorded at 5000 clicks/s from that at 40 clicks/s at a fixed stimulus level) were examined to compare how they separated the normally hearing and hearing impaired subjects. When compared to the results for both conventional and MLS linear or LNL TEOAEs, the present study found that the RNL results best reflected the patients' hearing loss, although the conventional linear and LNL responses performed nearly as well. Only two impaired ears (2%), both with a best threshold of 30 dB HL at 1000 Hz, produced RNL responses with amplitude within the range produced by 95% of the normal group.
ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Hearing Research - Volume 203, Issues 1â2, May 2005, Pages 122-133
Journal: Hearing Research - Volume 203, Issues 1â2, May 2005, Pages 122-133
نویسندگان
Jemma E. Hine, A. Roger D. Thornton,