Line bisection under an attentional gradient induced by simulated neglect in healthy subjects

Whether an attentional gradient favouring the ipsilesional side is responsible for the line bisection errors in visual neglect is uncertain. We explored this by using a conjunction-search task on the right side of a computer screen to bias attention while healthy subjects performed line bisection. The first experiment used a probe detection task to confirm that the conjunction-search task created a rightward attentional gradient, as manifest in response times, detection rates, and fixation patterns. In the second experiment subjects performed line bisection with or without a simultaneous conjunction-search task. Fixation patterns in the latter condition were biased rightwards as in visual neglect, and bisection also showed a rightward bias, though modest. A third experiment using the probe detection task again showed that the attentional gradient induced by the conjunction-search task was reduced when subjects also performed line bisection, perhaps explaining the modest effects on bisection bias. Finally, an experiment with briefly viewed pre-bisected lines produced similar results, showing that the small size of the bisection bias was not due to an unlimited view allowing deployment of attentional resources to counteract the conjunction-search task's attentional gradient. These results show that an attentional gradient induced in healthy subjects can produce visual neglect-like visual scanning and a rightward shift of perceived line midpoint, but the modest size of this shift points to limitations of this physiological model in simulating the pathologic effects of visual neglect.

► We examined line bisection using simulated visual hemineglect in healthy people.
► A visual search task on the right of the screen created an attentional gradient.
► As in hemineglect patients, ocular fixations were biased to the right of the line.
► Mean bisection points were shifted rightward compared to control.