کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
972737 932671 2012 11 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
The gender dimension of technical change and the role of task inputs
کلمات کلیدی
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم انسانی و اجتماعی اقتصاد، اقتصادسنجی و امور مالی اقتصاد و اقتصادسنجی
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
The gender dimension of technical change and the role of task inputs
چکیده انگلیسی

By 2011, the employment shares of UK graduate men and women had become equal for the first time. With no evidence of a significantly declining graduate female–male wage differential, this suggests that the relative demand for graduate women must have increased in order to accommodate the faster increase in their relative supply. However, gender clustering in degree subjects suggests that male and female graduates may not be perfect substitutes in production and therefore that gender biases may exist in the relative demand and supply of graduate labour. Consequently, this paper investigates whether industry level skill demand shifts have differed for men and women, focussing specifically on the role of technical change and job task inputs. The paper shows that, despite the large growth in the percentage of women obtaining a degree, overall women lost out from technical change between 1997 and 2006. This was most likely as a consequence of their lower quality numeracy and literacy skills, as well as other skills required to undertake the tasks that are correlated with technical change, especially in highly computerised private sector industries like finance and machine manufacturing.


► Overall UK women lost out from technical change between 1997 and 2006.
► The fall in demand for mid-skilled women exceeded the increase for skilled women.
► Skill demand shifts had a male bias in finance and machine manufacturing sectors.
► Numeracy task inputs are found to be highly correlated with technical change.
► Men possess better numeracy skills than women, on average.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Labour Economics - Volume 19, Issue 4, August 2012, Pages 516–526
نویسندگان
,