کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
978153 1645121 2007 11 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
The role of inflexible minorities in the breaking of democratic opinion dynamics
موضوعات مرتبط
مهندسی و علوم پایه ریاضیات فیزیک ریاضی
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
The role of inflexible minorities in the breaking of democratic opinion dynamics
چکیده انگلیسی

We study the effect of inflexible agents on two state opinion dynamics. The model operates via repeated local updates of random grouping of agents. While floater agents do eventually flip their opinion to follow the local majority, inflexible agents keep their opinion always unchanged. It is a quenched individual opinion. In the bare model (no inflexibles), a separator at 50%50% drives the dynamics towards either one of two pure attractors, each associated with a full polarization along one of the opinions. The initial majority wins. The existence of inflexibles for only one of the two opinions is found to shift the separator at a lower value than 50%50% in favor of that side. Moreover it creates an incompressible minority around the inflexibles, one of the pure attractors becoming a mixed phase attractor. In addition above a threshold of 17%17% inflexibles make their side sure of winning whatever the initial conditions are. The inflexible minority wins. An equal presence of inflexibles on both sides restores the balanced dynamics with again a separator at 50%50% and now two mixed phase attractors on each side. Nevertheless, beyond 25%25% the dynamics is reversed with a unique attractor at a 50–50 stable equilibrium. But a very small advantage in inflexibles results in a decisive lowering of the separator at the advantage of the corresponding opinion. A few percent advantage does guarantee to become majority with one single attractor. The model is solved exhaustedly for groups of size 3.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications - Volume 381, 15 July 2007, Pages 366–376
نویسندگان
, ,