Consideration of some taphonomic variables of relevance to forensic palynological investigation in the United Kingdom

Palynology is a long established and respected branch of environmental science that has been applied to criminal investigation in a meaningful way only in recent years. It has proved to be remarkably versatile in many kinds of criminal enquiry. It is not, however, an absolute science; palynological data are on a par with the suites of symptoms which allow medical practitioners to make diagnoses. Taphonomic variability is the main factor complicating interpretation of forensic palynological data. Palynological taphonomy may be defined as “all the factors that influence whether a palynomorph (pollen, spore, or other microscopic entity) will be found at a specific place at a specific time”.If taphonomic variability is anticipated, and regularly tested, palynology will continue to keep its place in the armoury of useful forensic methods. Some assumptions made by palynologists engaged in palaeoecology and archaeology have been shown to be untenable in the forensic context. Palynological and botanical profiling of crime scenes has demonstrated anomalies which challenge received wisdoms. It has proved impossible to obtain palynological population data because every site is unique—expectations of any palynological profile can only be crude. The palynological status of any place must be tested every time. Without a body of analytical data from the actual crime scene, it is difficult to see how any palynologist can hope to present credible arguments under cross-examination. The statements made in this paper relate mainly to work carried out in the United Kingdom.