کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
10079277 | 1603628 | 2005 | 5 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Assessment of clavicular translation after arthroscopic Mumford procedure: Direct versus indirect resection-A cadaveric study
دانلود مقاله + سفارش ترجمه
دانلود مقاله ISI انگلیسی
رایگان برای ایرانیان
کلمات کلیدی
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت
پزشکی و دندانپزشکی
ارتوپدی، پزشکی ورزشی و توانبخشی
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
![عکس صفحه اول مقاله: Assessment of clavicular translation after arthroscopic Mumford procedure: Direct versus indirect resection-A cadaveric study Assessment of clavicular translation after arthroscopic Mumford procedure: Direct versus indirect resection-A cadaveric study](/preview/png/10079277.png)
چکیده انگلیسی
Purpose: To compare the horizontal stability of the distal clavicle following arthroscopic resection of its lateral end by direct and indirect techniques.Type of study: Biomechanical test of cadaveric specimens.Methods: We performed arthroscopic distal clavicle resection on 12 fresh-frozen human cadaveric shoulders using direct (group 1, n = 6) or indirect (group 2, n = 6) approaches. In both groups 5 mm of distal clavicle were resected using an arthroscopic burr. The specimens were mounted on a materials testing device that allowed translation of the clavicle along the anteroposterior axis. The degree of posterior translation was measured from maximum anterior displacement of the clavicle.Results: Mean posterior translation was 19.4 mm (range, 18 to 23 mm; SD, 2.2) and 21.3 mm (range, 18 to 25 mm; SD, 3.1) for groups 1 and 2, respectively. This difference was not statistically significant (P = .27).Conclusions: This study suggests that there is no significant difference in anteroposterior stability of the clavicle following arthroscopic distal clavicle resection with either a direct or indirect approach.Clinical relevance: Clinically, this study addresses concerns about increased potential instability associated with the indirect technique of distal clavicle resection. From a biomechanical standpoint, based on this study, there is no concern for increased instability with the indirect technique of distal clavicle resection compared to a direct technique.
ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery - Volume 21, Issue 1, January 2005, Pages 64-68
Journal: Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery - Volume 21, Issue 1, January 2005, Pages 64-68
نویسندگان
Craig A. M.D., Bernard C. M.D., Laith M. M.D., Thomas M.D., Christian S. M.D., Jeffrey M.D., Andrew S. M.D.,