Fish bone chemistry and ultrastructure: implications for taphonomy and stable isotope analysis

This paper reviews the ultrastructure and chemistry of fish bone, with an emphasis on zooarchaeology and stable isotope analysis. On the basis of the chemical composition of the collagen and the relationships between the collagen and mineral phases, fish bone is more susceptible to biotic and abiotic degradation than mammalian bone and is therefore less likely to be recovered in archaeological deposits. The amino acid composition of fish bone differs from that of mammals, most notably with respect to hydroxyproline content. The C:N ratio of fish collagen is, however, very similar and slightly lower than mammalian collagen, and thus the traditional range of acceptable C:N ratios for archaeological bone collagen (2.9–3.6) should not be shifted or extended for fish on the basis of the amino acid composition of collagen. An extensive survey of published archaeological bone collagen C:N ratios demonstrates that fish collagen from archaeological contexts tends to have significantly higher C:N ratios than mammalian collagen. The elevated C:N ratios in fish bone collagen may be the result of abiotic degradation processes that occur within the bone after death, the presence of exogenous humic contaminants, or endogenous lipid contaminants.

► Because of chemical and structural differences, fish bone is more susceptible to biotic and abiotic degradation than mammalian bone.
► The traditional range of acceptable C:N ratios for bone collagen (2.9–3.6) is applicable to fish and should not be expanded.
► C/N ratios in archaeological fish bone collagen are frequently high, possibly due to abiotic degradation, or lipid/humic contaminants