کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
1049968 | 1484654 | 2011 | 8 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |

Understanding the spatial patterns of wildfire ignition and spread has important implications for landscape planning for reducing fire hazard. In this paper we characterise the patterns of wildfire occurrence in 3 regions of northern Portugal, using selection ratio functions to evaluate the fire proneness of different land cover and topographic categories. For attaining this objective we characterised 1382 wildfires larger than 5 ha, which occurred in the years 1990–1991, according to land cover (10 categories), slope (5 categories) and aspect (5 categories) within which they occurred. For each fire, the use of the different land cover and topographic categories was compared with availability in a surrounding buffer. For land cover, fire proneness was much higher in shrublands, whereas agricultural areas and agro-forestry systems where less likely to burn. In terms of slope, steep slopes were more prone to fire. Differences in land cover in the different slope categories contributed to this result, although there was an overall slope effect on the fire proneness of all land cover types. In terms of aspect, only flat areas were less fire prone. Finally, there were regional variations in land cover susceptibility to fire, but these did not occur for slope or aspect. In terms of landscape planning these results suggest that the more effective fuel breaks should be implemented in areas with agricultural crops in flat slopes.
▶ Wildfire patterns were characterised in relation to land cover and topography. ▶ Fire proneness was higher in shrublands and steep slopes. ▶ There was a slope effect on the fire proneness of all land cover types. ▶ There were regional variations in fire proneness for land cover, but not for slope or aspect. ▶ Landscape fuel breaks should be implemented in areas with agricultural crops in flat slopes.
Journal: Landscape and Urban Planning - Volume 100, Issues 1–2, 30 March 2011, Pages 169–176