کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
10513745 | 950921 | 2014 | 8 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
The Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30) and Functional Assessment of Cancer-General (FACT-G) differ in responsiveness, relative efficiency, and therefore required sample size
دانلود مقاله + سفارش ترجمه
دانلود مقاله ISI انگلیسی
رایگان برای ایرانیان
کلمات کلیدی
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت
پزشکی و دندانپزشکی
سیاست های بهداشت و سلامت عمومی
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
![عکس صفحه اول مقاله: The Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30) and Functional Assessment of Cancer-General (FACT-G) differ in responsiveness, relative efficiency, and therefore required sample size The Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30) and Functional Assessment of Cancer-General (FACT-G) differ in responsiveness, relative efficiency, and therefore required sample size](/preview/png/10513745.png)
چکیده انگلیسی
FACT-G would require about one-third the sample of QLQ-C30 to detect a given change in overall HRQOL, whereas in the social domain, it would require five times the sample size. FACT-G won advantage in overall HRQOL by reduced “noise” (smaller standard deviation achieved by summing across 27 items), whereas QLQ-C30 won advantage in the social domain via a larger “signal” (achieved through well-targeted item content).
ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Journal of Clinical Epidemiology - Volume 67, Issue 1, January 2014, Pages 100-107
Journal: Journal of Clinical Epidemiology - Volume 67, Issue 1, January 2014, Pages 100-107
نویسندگان
Madeleine T. King, Melanie L. Bell, Daniel Costa, Phyllis Butow, Byeongsang Oh,