کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
1065237 | 1485855 | 2012 | 7 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
This paper presents the cost-benefit methodology used in the appraisal of railway infrastructure in Norway, Sweden, Denmark, the UK, France, Germany and Switzerland. The consequences of differences in methodology are illustrated by a case-study undertaken with the methodology from each of the seven countries. Differences in methodology means that results from the analyses are far from similar. The case project has a positive net present value based on Swiss and British methodology, but negative net present value using methodology from any of the other five countries.
► A railway project is analysed using the appraisal methodology of seven countries.
► The countries are Norway, Sweden, Denmark, the UK, France, Germany and Switzerland.
► The project has a positive net present value based on Swiss and British methodology.
► The project has negative net present value using methodology from the other five countries.
Journal: Transport Policy - Volume 22, July 2012, Pages 29–35