“Careworkers don't have a voice:” Epistemological violence in residential care for older people

• This study finds the reductionist worldview continues to dominate nursing home care.
• This results in numerous harms, which we refer to as epistemological violence.
• Harms found include: routinization, dehumanization and significant knowledge loss.
• Workers reported distress and demoralization as a result of epistemological violence.
• Quality improvement strategies must respect the logic of care in order to succeed.

Drawing on feminist epistemologies, this paper attends to the way the reductionist assumptions have shaped the organization of nursing home carework in manners that are insufficient to the needs of relational care. This paper is informed by a study involving nine focus groups and a survey of Canadian residential care workers (141 RNs, 139 LPNs and 415 frontline careworkers). Four major themes were identified. Reductionist assumptions contributed to routinized, task-based approaches to care, resulting in what careworkers termed “assembly line care.” Insufficient time and emphasis on the relational dimensions of care made it difficult to “treat residents as human beings.” Accountability, enacted as counting and documenting, led to an “avalanche of paperwork” that took time away from care. Finally, hierarchies of knowledge contributed to systemic exclusions and the perception that “careworkers' don't have a voice.” Careworkers reported distress as a result of the tensions between the organization of work and the needs of relational care. We theorize these findings as examples of “epistemological violence,” a concept coined by Vandana Shiva (1988) to name the harm that results from the hegemony of reductionist assumptions. While not acting alone, we argue that reductionism has played an important role in shaping the context of care both at a policy and organizational level, and it continues to shape the solutions to problems in nursing home care in ways that pose challenges for careworkers. We conclude by suggesting that improving the quality of both work and care will require respecting the specificities of care and its unique epistemological and ontological nature.