کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
1083499 951005 2009 8 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Non-Cochrane vs. Cochrane reviews were twice as likely to have positive conclusion statements: cross-sectional study
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت پزشکی و دندانپزشکی سیاست های بهداشت و سلامت عمومی
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
Non-Cochrane vs. Cochrane reviews were twice as likely to have positive conclusion statements: cross-sectional study
چکیده انگلیسی
SRs including a meta-analysis of the primary outcome may be affected by indirect publication bias in our sample. Differences between the results and conclusions of Cochrane and non-Cochrane reviews were apparent. Further research on publication-related issues of SRs is warranted.
ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Journal of Clinical Epidemiology - Volume 62, Issue 4, April 2009, Pages 380-386.e1
نویسندگان
, , , , ,