کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
1085441 | 951359 | 2010 | 12 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
![عکس صفحه اول مقاله: Women's accounts of the physical sensation of chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis: expectations and experience Women's accounts of the physical sensation of chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis: expectations and experience](/preview/png/1085441.png)
Objectiveto understand women's expectations and experience of discomfort during chorionic villus sampling (CVS) and amniocentesis, and relate them to aspects of clinical practice.Designthematic analysis of narrative interviews. Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim, coded and analysed using computer-assisted qualitative data analysis software.Participants and settingsample recruited nationally for two wider studies of experiences of antenatal screening (n=47) and experiences of ending a pregnancy for fetal abnormality (n=40). Of these, 31 women had experienced amniocentesis and/or CVS at least once.Findingsmost women found the procedures less painful than expected. A smaller group were shocked or surprised at the sensation, and were worried that they had jumped and that the needle might have damaged the baby. A few found it very painful, using vivid imagery of being stabbed or punctured. However, even those who found it worse than expected felt it was worth the pain to get a definite diagnosis. Women identified a range of factors affecting their experience, including levels of anxiety, prior experience or knowledge of the procedures, levels of information provided, trust in the skill of the operator, or reassurance and empathy of the staff involved.Conclusions and implications for practicethe needs of a small minority of women who find CVS or amniocentesis shocking and/or painful may be overlooked. A review of pre-test information and procedures is recommended to ensure that women are better prepared for possible physical sensations during the procedures to address the needs of this minority.
Journal: Midwifery - Volume 26, Issue 1, February 2010, Pages 64–75