کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
1144900 | 957439 | 2011 | 11 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
![عکس صفحه اول مقاله: A minimum asymptotic mean squared error controller for an IMA(1,1) noise process with a starting offset, and its resetting design A minimum asymptotic mean squared error controller for an IMA(1,1) noise process with a starting offset, and its resetting design](/preview/png/1144900.png)
In a discrete-part manufacturing process, the noise is often described by an IMA(1,1) process and the pure unit delay transfer function is used as the feedback controller to adjust it. The optimal controller for this process is the well-known minimum mean square error (MMSE) controller. The starting level of the IMA(1,1) model is assumed to be on target when it starts. Considering such an impractical assumption, we adopt the starting offset. Since the starting offset is not observable, the MMSE controller does not exist. An alternative to the MMSE controller is the minimum asymptotic mean square error controller, which makes the long-run mean square error minimum.Another concern in this article is the un-stability of the controller, which may produce high adjustment costs and/or may exceed the physical bounds of the process adjustment. These practical barriers will prevent the controller to adjust the process properly. To avoid this dilemma, a resetting design is proposed. That is, the resetting procedure in use of the controller is to adjust the process according to the controller when it remains within the reset limit, and to reset the process, otherwise.The total cost for the manufacturing process is affected by the off-target cost, the adjustment cost, and the reset cost. Proper values for the reset limit are selected to minimize the average cost per reset interval (ACR) considering various process parameters and cost parameters. A time non-homogeneous Markov chain approach is used for calculating the ACR. The effect of adopting the starting offset is also studied here.
Journal: Journal of the Korean Statistical Society - Volume 40, Issue 3, September 2011, Pages 313–323